{"id":55979,"date":"2025-10-27T14:45:34","date_gmt":"2025-10-27T21:45:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/svch.io\/?p=55979"},"modified":"2026-07-15T11:36:52","modified_gmt":"2026-07-15T18:36:52","slug":"ai-sales-agents-stack-up-insights-from-meta-analysis-for-leaders","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/svch.io\/es\/ai-sales-agents-stack-up-insights-from-meta-analysis-for-leaders\/","title":{"rendered":"AI Sales Agents Stack Up: Insights from Meta-Analysis for Leaders"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>TL;DR<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A new meta-analysis shows that automated agents (chatbots, algorithms, robots) often perform <em>similarly<\/em> to human agents in customer responses\u2014<em>if<\/em> deployed under the right conditions. For sales teams and AI strategists, the takeaway is: align the tool with the task and stage, rather than assuming human always trumps machine.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">\u201cAutomated Versus Human Agents: A Meta-Analysis of Customer Responses to Robots, Chatbots, and Algorithms and Their Contingencies\u201d<\/h3>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Authors &amp; Affiliations:<\/strong> Katja Gelbrich (Catholic University Eichst\u00e4tt-Ingolstadt), Holger Roschk (Aalborg University Business School), Sandra Miederer (Catholic University Eichst\u00e4tt-Ingolstadt), Alina Kerath (Catholic University Eichst\u00e4tt-Ingolstadt)\u00a0<\/li>\n<li><strong>Journal:<\/strong> <em>Journal of Marketing<\/em> (2025)\u00a0<\/li>\n<li><strong>Link:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00222429251344139\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00222429251344139<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Description, Key Takeaways, Methodology &amp; Relevance<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Description &amp; Methodology:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This paper reports a meta-analysis of 943 effect sizes drawn from 327 empirical studies, examining customer responses when interacting with three types of automated agents (robots, chatbots, algorithms) compared to human agents in marketing and sales-adjacent contexts.&nbsp; The authors identify contingency factors (e.g., type of agent, task complexity, stage of interaction) that affect when automated agents are equivalent to human agents.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Key Takeaways:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Customers may enter interactions with skepticism toward automated agents, but when performance and relevance are high, their behavior (choice, purchase) often aligns with interacting with a human agent.\u00a0<\/li>\n<li>The three agent types (robots, chatbots, algorithms) differ in their contingencies: what works for a chatbot may <em>not<\/em> generalize to a robot or a purely algorithmic agent.\u00a0<\/li>\n<li>Some factors increase the \u201csocial presence\u201d of the agent (making it feel more human-like) while others highlight its \u201cautomated presence\u201d (machine-identity). These dimensions matter for how customers respond.\u00a0<\/li>\n<li>The implication for business: deploy automated agents when their role aligns with tasks where they can deliver utilitarian value (speed, accuracy, scale), and reserve human agents for tasks where social presence, empathy, nuance matter. The authors orient toward labor shortage relief and capacity release concerns.\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"622\" src=\"https:\/\/svch.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Silicon-Valley-Certification-Hub-Alejandro-Cuauhtemoc-Mejia-Daniel-Gomez-Artificial-Intelligence-AI-Certifications-Automated-Versus-Human-Agents-2-1024x622.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-55980\" srcset=\"https:\/\/svch.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Silicon-Valley-Certification-Hub-Alejandro-Cuauhtemoc-Mejia-Daniel-Gomez-Artificial-Intelligence-AI-Certifications-Automated-Versus-Human-Agents-2-1024x622.png 1024w, https:\/\/svch.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Silicon-Valley-Certification-Hub-Alejandro-Cuauhtemoc-Mejia-Daniel-Gomez-Artificial-Intelligence-AI-Certifications-Automated-Versus-Human-Agents-2-300x182.png 300w, https:\/\/svch.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Silicon-Valley-Certification-Hub-Alejandro-Cuauhtemoc-Mejia-Daniel-Gomez-Artificial-Intelligence-AI-Certifications-Automated-Versus-Human-Agents-2-768x466.png 768w, https:\/\/svch.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Silicon-Valley-Certification-Hub-Alejandro-Cuauhtemoc-Mejia-Daniel-Gomez-Artificial-Intelligence-AI-Certifications-Automated-Versus-Human-Agents-2-1536x933.png 1536w, https:\/\/svch.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Silicon-Valley-Certification-Hub-Alejandro-Cuauhtemoc-Mejia-Daniel-Gomez-Artificial-Intelligence-AI-Certifications-Automated-Versus-Human-Agents-2-1320x801.png 1320w, https:\/\/svch.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Silicon-Valley-Certification-Hub-Alejandro-Cuauhtemoc-Mejia-Daniel-Gomez-Artificial-Intelligence-AI-Certifications-Automated-Versus-Human-Agents-2-600x364.png 600w, https:\/\/svch.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Silicon-Valley-Certification-Hub-Alejandro-Cuauhtemoc-Mejia-Daniel-Gomez-Artificial-Intelligence-AI-Certifications-Automated-Versus-Human-Agents-2.png 1624w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">F<strong>igure 1 \u2014 Meta-Analytic Framework for Customer Responses to Automated vs. Human Agents<\/strong><\/h2>\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>What It Shows<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Figure 1 presents the <strong>conceptual model<\/strong> the authors used to structure their meta-analysis of 943 effect sizes across 327 empirical studies (2000\u20132023).<\/p>\n<p>It maps how <strong>different types of AI agents<\/strong> (robots, chatbots, algorithms) influence <strong>customer responses<\/strong> through three main drivers:<\/p>\n<ol start=\"1\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Design Features<\/strong>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><em>Name vs. no name<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Humanlike appearance<\/em> These influence whether customers feel social connection or perceive the agent as \u201ccoldly mechanical.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Task-Related Intelligence<\/strong>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Dimensions such as <em>verbal-linguistic<\/em>, <em>social<\/em>, <em>visual-spatial<\/em>, <em>processing speed<\/em>, and <em>logic-mathematical<\/em> skills. These determine whether the automated agent appears capable of handling the specific sales or service task.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Contextual Factors<\/strong>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Emotional situations (<em>embarrassing<\/em> vs. neutral experiences)<\/li>\n<li><em>Social identity<\/em> relevance (e.g., whether the interaction touches on personal identity or belonging)<\/li>\n<li><em>Utilitarian<\/em> vs. <em>hedonic<\/em> contexts (functional purchase vs. pleasure-driven)<\/li>\n<li><em>Expertise requirement<\/em> (high vs. low)<\/li>\n<li><em>Outcome valence<\/em> (positive vs. negative results)<\/li>\n<li><em>Time<\/em> (how these perceptions evolved from 2000\u20132023)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>All of these lead to <strong>customer responses<\/strong>, grouped into:<\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><em>Perceptions<\/em> (e.g., warmth, competence, human-likeness)<\/li>\n<li><em>Appraisals<\/em> (attitudes toward agent or firm)<\/li>\n<li><em>Intentions<\/em> (purchase, recommendation)<\/li>\n<li><em>Behaviors<\/em> (actual engagement or conversion)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Why It Matters<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>This framework shows that customers react to AI not simply because it\u2019s a \u201crobot\u201d or \u201cchatbot,\u201d but because of <strong>how it\u2019s designed<\/strong>, <strong>what kind of task it performs<\/strong>, and <strong>the situation it\u2019s used in<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>For sales and marketing teams, it highlights that deploying AI tools effectively requires understanding these <em>interaction layers<\/em>\u2014especially which contexts need a \u201chuman touch.\u201d<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"917\" src=\"https:\/\/svch.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Silicon-Valley-Certification-Hub-Alejandro-Cuauhtemoc-Mejia-Daniel-Gomez-Artificial-Intelligence-AI-Certifications-Automated-Versus-Human-Agents-1024x917.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-55982\" srcset=\"https:\/\/svch.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Silicon-Valley-Certification-Hub-Alejandro-Cuauhtemoc-Mejia-Daniel-Gomez-Artificial-Intelligence-AI-Certifications-Automated-Versus-Human-Agents-1024x917.png 1024w, https:\/\/svch.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Silicon-Valley-Certification-Hub-Alejandro-Cuauhtemoc-Mejia-Daniel-Gomez-Artificial-Intelligence-AI-Certifications-Automated-Versus-Human-Agents-300x269.png 300w, https:\/\/svch.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Silicon-Valley-Certification-Hub-Alejandro-Cuauhtemoc-Mejia-Daniel-Gomez-Artificial-Intelligence-AI-Certifications-Automated-Versus-Human-Agents-768x688.png 768w, https:\/\/svch.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Silicon-Valley-Certification-Hub-Alejandro-Cuauhtemoc-Mejia-Daniel-Gomez-Artificial-Intelligence-AI-Certifications-Automated-Versus-Human-Agents-1320x1182.png 1320w, https:\/\/svch.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Silicon-Valley-Certification-Hub-Alejandro-Cuauhtemoc-Mejia-Daniel-Gomez-Artificial-Intelligence-AI-Certifications-Automated-Versus-Human-Agents-600x537.png 600w, https:\/\/svch.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Silicon-Valley-Certification-Hub-Alejandro-Cuauhtemoc-Mejia-Daniel-Gomez-Artificial-Intelligence-AI-Certifications-Automated-Versus-Human-Agents.png 1478w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Figure 2 \u2014 When Automated Agents Equal Human Agents<\/strong><\/h2>\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>What It Shows<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Figure 2 quantifies <strong>how close automated agents (AAs)<\/strong>\u2014robots, chatbots, or algorithms\u2014come to matching <strong>human agents (HAs)<\/strong> across specific contingencies.<\/p>\n<p>The gray shaded areas indicate where <strong>AAs perform equivalently to humans<\/strong> in terms of customer responses.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Key Findings by Category<\/strong><\/h3>\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>\ud83e\udd16 Robots<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>On average, robots underperform humans (effect size \u2248 \u20130.20).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Adding a name<\/strong> almost eliminates the gap (raising performance to \u20130.017).<\/li>\n<li>Robots with <strong>humanlike appearance<\/strong>, <strong>verbal-linguistic<\/strong> or <strong>visual-spatial intelligence<\/strong> also narrow the difference.<\/li>\n<li>However, when the context involves <strong>social-identity experiences<\/strong>, the gap widens (\u20130.489)\u2014people prefer humans in socially sensitive situations.<\/li>\n<li>Negative outcomes (complaints, failures) also magnify the preference for humans.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>\ud83d\udcac Chatbots<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Chatbots perform nearly on par with humans (average \u2248 \u20130.10).<\/li>\n<li>The difference disappears (or even reverses) when customers have <strong>embarrassing experiences<\/strong>, such as health or financial issues (effect \u2248 +0.28). \u2192 People may prefer the <em>privacy<\/em> and <em>non-judgment<\/em> of a bot.<\/li>\n<li>With <strong>negative outcomes<\/strong>, chatbots fare worse (\u20130.117) because empathy becomes important.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>\ud83d\udcca Algorithms<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Algorithms (e.g., recommendation systems) start at a slightly worse baseline (\u20130.137).<\/li>\n<li>But in <strong>utilitarian contexts<\/strong> (functional tasks like pricing, logistics), they outperform expectations (\u20130.076).<\/li>\n<li><strong>High-expertise roles<\/strong> and <strong>negative outcomes<\/strong> still favor humans.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Why It Matters<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>The chart shows that AI can rival\u2014or even outperform\u2014humans <strong>under the right design and context<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>For instance:<\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Use chatbots for <em>sensitive<\/em> or <em>routine<\/em> tasks where customers value privacy and efficiency.<\/li>\n<li>Use human agents for <em>social identity<\/em> or <em>high-stakes<\/em> contexts where empathy matters.<\/li>\n<li>Design robots with <strong>human cues (names, faces, language)<\/strong> to build trust and comfort.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This paper offers rigorous evidence on how AI (automated agents) can support or replace human efforts in sales and marketing contexts. For executives or sales leaders considering AI certification or AI-driven transformation, the insights help frame a strategy: which agents to deploy, at what stage of the sales funnel, and how to measure their effectiveness. This matters for building capability, driving revenue, and aligning AI initiatives with business value rather than novelty.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n<h1 class=\"wp-block-heading has-normal-font-size\">If you\u2019re a sales leader, marketing executive, or non-technical executive looking to integrate AI into your revenue operations, the SVCH\u2019s Certification Program for Chief AI Officer (CAIO) is tailored for you. We cover how to evaluate AI use-cases like automated agents, align them with sales funnel stages, and build governance around performance metrics and stakeholder readiness. Enroll now to turn research findings like these into actionable strategy and competitive advantage.<\/h1>\n<p>\ud83d\udc49 <em>Learn more about our CAIO certification here.<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/svch.io\/caio-cp\/\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/svch.io\/caio-cp\/\">https:\/\/svch.io\/caio-cp\/<\/a><\/p>\n<div class=\"svch-faq\" style=\"background:#f8fafc;border-radius:14px;padding:36px 40px;margin:48px 0 0;border-top:4px solid #0ea5e9;\">\n<h2 style=\"font-size:1.4rem;color:#1e293b;font-weight:700;margin:0 0 28px;padding-left:18px;border-left:5px solid #0ea5e9;\">Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n<div class=\"faq-item\" style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;padding-bottom:20px;margin-bottom:20px;\">\n<h3 style=\"font-size:0.97rem;font-weight:700;color:#0f172a;margin:0 0 10px;\">What does this mean for a Chief AI Officer?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"color:#475569;font-size:0.95rem;line-height:1.7;margin:0;\">The meta-analysis validates that AI agents can match human performance in sales contexts, but only when deliberately matched to the right task and customer journey stage\u2014meaning your ROI depends on deployment strategy, not just technology capability. This shifts the CAO&#8217;s mandate from building the most sophisticated AI to systematically identifying which sales functions (lead qualification, onboarding, complex negotiation) benefit most from automation versus human touchpoints.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\" style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;padding-bottom:20px;margin-bottom:20px;\">\n<h3 style=\"font-size:0.97rem;font-weight:700;color:#0f172a;margin:0 0 10px;\">When should we replace human agents with AI, and when should we keep humans in the loop?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"color:#475569;font-size:0.95rem;line-height:1.7;margin:0;\">The research suggests AI excels at high-volume, rule-based tasks early in the sales funnel (initial inquiries, information delivery, qualification) where performance is measurable and customer skepticism is lower. For complex problem-solving, relationship-building, or objection handling later in the cycle, hybrid models\u2014where AI handles intake and data synthesis while humans engage on strategy and trust\u2014typically outperform either agent working alone.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\" style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;padding-bottom:20px;margin-bottom:20px;\">\n<h3 style=\"font-size:0.97rem;font-weight:700;color:#0f172a;margin:0 0 10px;\">How does this research help with AI Assessment for companies considering agent deployment?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"color:#475569;font-size:0.95rem;line-height:1.7;margin:0;\">Silicon Valley Certification Hub&#8217;s AI Assessment framework can help organizations benchmark their current agent performance against the meta-analysis findings, identifying gaps in task-contingency alignment and readiness for automation. By mapping your customer interactions against the study&#8217;s contingency factors (agent type, task complexity, interaction stage), you gain a data-backed roadmap for where AI agents will create value versus where they&#8217;ll erode customer trust.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\" style=\"\">\n<h3 style=\"font-size:0.97rem;font-weight:700;color:#0f172a;margin:0 0 10px;\">What should we do in the next 90 days to capitalize on these findings?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"color:#475569;font-size:0.95rem;line-height:1.7;margin:0;\">Conduct an audit of your current sales interactions to classify them by complexity and stage, then pilot automated agents in one low-risk, high-volume segment (such as lead screening or FAQ response) while measuring customer satisfaction and conversion rates against your human baseline. Use those results to build a business case for broader rollout and clarify which roles require retraining versus replacement.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"svch-cta\">\n<p>Want to know how this applies to your company?<\/p>\n<p>At Silicon Valley Certification Hub, we help you align AI + Strategy. Our team works directly with your directors and teams to assess AI readiness, identify gaps, and build a clear path forward \u2014 tailored to your business context.<\/p>\n<p>Book a time with our CEO, Alejandro Cuauhtemoc-Mejia:<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/calendar.app.google\/2ihQf2JH3D9uJBe68\">https:\/\/calendar.app.google\/2ihQf2JH3D9uJBe68<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Silicon Valley Certification Hub<br \/>3000 El Camino Real, Building 4, Palo Alto, CA<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>TL;DR A new meta-analysis shows that automated agents (chatbots, algorithms, robots) often perform similarly to human agents in customer responses\u2014if deployed under the right conditions. For sales teams and AI [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":155,"featured_media":59248,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"content-type":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"advanced_seo_description":"A new Journal of Marketing meta-analysis from the Catholic University of Eichst\u00e4tt-Ingolstadt and Aalborg University finds that robots, chatbots, and algorithms can perform as well as human agents\u2014if deployed under the right conditions. Discover key insights for sales and AI leaders on how design, context, and task type shape customer trust and performance.","jetpack_seo_html_title":"When Do AI Sales Agents Beat Humans? New Research Reveals the Surprising Answer","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_seo_schema_type":"","_price":"","_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_header":"","_tribe_default_ticket_provider":"","_tribe_ticket_capacity":"0","_ticket_start_date":"","_ticket_end_date":"","_tribe_ticket_show_description":"","_tribe_ticket_show_not_going":false,"_tribe_ticket_use_global_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_global_stock_level":"","_global_stock_mode":"","_global_stock_cap":"","_tribe_rsvp_for_event":"","_tribe_ticket_going_count":"","_tribe_ticket_not_going_count":"","_tribe_tickets_list":"[]","_tribe_ticket_has_attendee_info_fields":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[24],"tags":[433,475,480,463],"class_list":["post-55979","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-research","tag-ai","tag-soft-skills","tag-svch","tag-webinar"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/svch.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/silicon-valley-certification-hub-alejandro-cuauhtemoc-mejia-ai-sales-agents-meta-analysis-chatbot-algorithm-robot-performance-1.png","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/svch.io\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55979","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/svch.io\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/svch.io\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/svch.io\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/155"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/svch.io\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=55979"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/svch.io\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55979\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":59821,"href":"https:\/\/svch.io\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55979\/revisions\/59821"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/svch.io\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/59248"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/svch.io\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=55979"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/svch.io\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=55979"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/svch.io\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=55979"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}